1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2009 Ford Flex | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Flex |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |