1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2010 Honda CR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2010 Honda CR-V. (180 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 624 kg more than 2010 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Cadillac Brougham 2010 Honda CR-V
Make Cadillac Honda
Model Brougham CR-V
Year Released 1969 2010
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7734 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 228 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1556 kg
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 4554 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1819 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1679 mm
Wheelbase Size 3390 mm 2619 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 58 L