1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 184 kg more than 2010 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |