1969 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (245 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 485 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Brougham | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Brougham | C |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 245 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4591 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2008 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2760 mm |