1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Cadillac Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | Calais | 92 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1951 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |