1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1952 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 850 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1952 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Calais | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2260 mm |