1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 805 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Calais | XK |
Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |