1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 941 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 547 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: