1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1967 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Subaru FF-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Subaru FF-1 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1967 Subaru FF-1. (47 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1967 Subaru FF-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1967 Subaru FF-1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Cadillac Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Subaru FF-1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1967 Subaru FF-1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | Calais | FF-1 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 977 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |