1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 830 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Calais | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Calais | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
