1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1974 Lada 1300
To start off, 1974 Lada 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1974 Lada 1300.
Because 1974 Lada 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lada 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Calais | 1974 Lada 1300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | Calais | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 39 L |
