1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1980 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1980 ZIL 4104 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 ZIL 4104 (311 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1969 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1980 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | Calais | 4104 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 7695 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 108.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 3335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3340 mm |