1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Calais | Celeste |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |