1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1990 Citroen BX
To start off, 1990 Citroen BX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1990 Citroen BX. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 965 kg more than 1990 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Citroen BX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Citroen BX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1990 Citroen BX | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | Calais | BX |
Year Released | 1969 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |