1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 270 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Calais | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
