1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 953 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Cadillac Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Calais | 323 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |