1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 1998 Panoz Q9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Panoz Q9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Panoz Q9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Panoz Q9. (678 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Panoz Q9.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Panoz |
Model | Calais | Q9 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 710 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 59 L |