1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2000 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 602 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 2000 Proton 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Proton |
Model | Calais | 300 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 710 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |