1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML

To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML (232 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 25 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML.

Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML. (344 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Cadillac Calais 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model Calais ML
Year Released 1969 2001
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7734 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 228 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 710 Nm 344 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2075 kg 2050 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 72 L