1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Fiat Stilo

To start off, 2002 Fiat Stilo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2002 Fiat Stilo. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Fiat Stilo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Cadillac Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Cadillac Calais 2002 Fiat Stilo
Make Cadillac Fiat
Model Calais Stilo
Year Released 1969 2002
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7734 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 228 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 109.2 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 103.1 mm 90.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2100 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2610 mm