1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Ford F-150
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-150. (339 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Calais | 2002 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Calais | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 710 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3050 mm |
