1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Holden Frontera

To start off, 2002 Holden Frontera is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Holden Frontera. (202 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Frontera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 375 kg more than 2002 Holden Frontera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Holden Frontera is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Frontera will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Frontera. (290 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Frontera.

Compare all specifications: