1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1969 Cadillac Calais.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Calais | E-150 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 710 Nm | 388 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |