1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Compass. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 490 kg more than 2008 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Calais | Compass |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2640 mm |