1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1280 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Smart |
| Model | Calais | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1867 mm |
