1969 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 487 kg more than 2013 Volvo S60.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Calais | S60 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2776 mm |