1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1969 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | DeVille | FX |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 51 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
