1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600
To start off, 1969 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600. (247 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1969 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeVille | 600 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 6332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 111 L |