1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, both 1969 Cadillac DeVille and 1969 ZAZ 966 were released in the same year (1969). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZAZ |
Model | DeVille | 966 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2170 mm |