1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1193 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 616 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |
