1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma

To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Cadillac DeVille 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
Make Cadillac Mitsubishi
Model DeVille Sigma
Year Released 1969 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7734 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 228 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 2105 kg 1070 kg
Vehicle Length 5730 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2520 mm