1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1995 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1995 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 700 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 1995 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 77 L |