1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 700 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeVille | F200 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 408 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1405 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |