1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Land Rover Range Rover. (187 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 35 kg more than 1969 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | DeVille | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2750 mm |
