1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1320 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | DeVille | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1810 mm |