1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (120 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 635 kg more than 2002 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 6 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |