1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |