1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 515 kg more than 1969 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | DeVille | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |
