1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | DeVille | Smart |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 106 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 47 L |
