1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML (232 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 80 kg more than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeVille | ML |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 83 L |