1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Because 1969 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | MX-Flexa |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
