1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1969 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | DeVille | Citi |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 49 L |