1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (247 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 440 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | DeVille | BLS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |