1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 6 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |