1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 239 kg more than 2010 Mazda BT-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |