1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 4 kg more than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | DeVille | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |