1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 820 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | DeVille | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
