1969 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 430 kg more than 1969 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | DeVille | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 6290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 4180 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |
