1969 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (376 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1969 Cadillac Eldorado. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Catalina should accelerate faster than 1969 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 185 kg more than 1965 Pontiac Catalina.
Because 1965 Pontiac Catalina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Catalina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Eldorado (710 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Pontiac Catalina. (625 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Pontiac Catalina.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Cadillac Eldorado | 1965 Pontiac Catalina | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | Eldorado | Catalina |
Year Released | 1969 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7732 cc | 6891 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 710 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 103.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 103.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3080 mm |