1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1981 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4950 cc | 797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1940 mm |